AI Pentesting for CISOs and security leaders

Your applications will be tested by AI. Make sure yours gets there first.

Attackers get speed and scale. You get something they do not have: the business context of your own applications. Escape turns that into continuous AI-driven pentests, with exploitability proven, owners attached, and the coverage numbers a CISO can take to the board.

Book a demo
Book a demo
agentic multi-step attack chains
coverage proof
Regression testing at scale
Trusted by security leaders worldwide
New challenges keeping CISOs up at night

Offense got faster.
Coverage did not.

Exploit development used to be the bottleneck. It is not anymore. Every plan that assumed a few weeks of margin now has to assume none, while your engineering org ships AI-generated code faster than any review cycle absorbs it.
The window closed
Patch cycles, quarterly pentests and compensating controls were priced against a gap that no longer exists.
The estate grew
AI-generated services, MCP servers, LLM integrations and agentic endpoints are in scope now. Most have never been pentested.
The team did not
Same number of people, same budget, more of everything else. Headcount stopped being the lever a while ago.
4 hours saved
on daily builds
4 hours saved
on daily builds
4 hours saved
on daily builds
4 hours saved
on daily builds

An attacker's AI does not know how your business works.
Yours does.

Autonomous tooling is good at breadth. It is much weaker at context: which role should never reach which record, what the refund flow is supposed to enforce, which tenant boundary actually matters. Pointed at your own applications, that context finds the business logic flaws first.
one giant leap for automating pentesting

Coverage that does not stop at what fit in the statement of work

393%
ROI seen by security teams
An annual engagement covers the applications you could scope in time. Escape's agentic architecture keeps a memory of your context across engagements: your roles, your payment paths, your tenant boundaries. Testing runs across every application you own, continuously, which turns offensive security from a budget line into a quality gate.
Book a demo
Book a demo
vulnerabilities is NOT the final frontier

Proof that gets engineering to move

80%
time-to-remediation reduction versus manual or semi-manual processes
Mean time to remediate is the number your board actually feels. Engineers do not act on "we found a BOLA, see the OWASP guidance". They act on the exact request chain an attacker used and the fix written for their framework. Escape delivers both, which is why the metric moves instead of the backlog.
Book a demo
Book a demo
Yesterday's finding.Today's regression test.

Every finding is proven, then re-tested forever

<1 hour
from AI pentesting result to organization-wide testing
Risk should compound in your favour. Feed in previous pentest and bug bounty findings and Escape converts them into automated regression tests that run on every build with DAST. The same vulnerability never ships twice, and your coverage does not reset at the start of each quarter.
Book a demo
Book a demo
AND MUCH MORE

The details that separate a real offensive security program from a compliance checkbox.

Automations, workflows, AI-powered setup assistance. Everything is built in for a small team to scale their penetration testing program across the entire org and prove the ROI to leadership.
PCI-DSS requires application security testing on every significant change. SOC2 and ISO 27001 expect documented, regular assessments. Escape provides with detailed reporting and visibility with no human in the loop.
Public and private - You stay in control. Cloud and on-prem hybrid deployments mean you can run assessments even on internal applications without giving external consultants or bug hunters access to your infrastructure.
ready to scale your penetration testing?

Schedule a call with one of our experts

Book a demo
Book a demo
The Mythos-ready checklist

Six questions worth answering before someone answers them for you

/01

Do you know every endpoint, and who owns it?

Inventory
Continuous inventory of APIs, SPAs and third-party dependencies, with findings routed to the owning team.
/02

Does testing match the speed you ship?

Cadence
Business logic testing on every deploy, not scheduled engagements twice a year.
/03

Are attack chains retested after the fix?

chains
Regression testing so the same class of issue does not ship twice.
/04

Can you prove what is real?

Evidence
Findings ranked by reachability and business impact, each with reproduction steps and a remediation path.
/05

Is the AI you build with in scope?

AI Scope
MCP servers, LLM integrations and agentic endpoints tested like any other surface.
/06

Can you answer the board with numbers?

Metrics
Coverage, mean time to detect, mean time to contain and time to fix, tracked continuously.

Don't take our word for it

What modern security leaders say about Escape
My developers are now putting effort into removing vulnerabilities. You can see my team's using the platform every month. On a regular basis. So we don't just have the platform as a box-ticking exercise; we're actually using it to drive security into our platforms to make them more secure.
Ben Dalby
CDO
393%
ROI seen by the Head of Application and Offensive Security at a large multinational organization
We saw Escape being a lot smarter, understanding what’s happening, where it is located. I think this is where tooling and security tooling overall is going.
Nick Semyonov
IT & Security Director
Venture further into Escape

FAQ: What CISOs ask us

Can AI really replace a pentester?

Not entirely, and we would not claim it. Escape replaces the repeatable part: broad coverage, business logic testing, regression, proof of exploitability. Novel research, physical and social engineering, and complex red team objectives stay human.

How is this different from a scanner?

A scanner tests one request at a time against a rule list. Escape chains actions across an application, holds state, and works toward an objective. The output is an attack path, not an alert.

Does it satisfy our pentest requirement for PCI DSS or DORA?

It gives you continuous testing and continuous evidence across your estate. Talk to your assessor about your specific scope.

Can we run it on internal applications?

Yes. Public and private environments, hybrid cloud and on-prem, without giving external parties access to internal systems.

Does Escape replace my annual API pentest?

For most scope, yes. Teams under a specific attestation requirement usually keep a human engagement for the sign-off and use Escape for coverage the other fifty-one weeks.

What compliance standards does Escape help with?

Escape maps findings to the OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Top 10, PCI DSS, SOC 2, DORA, CRA, HITRUST CSF, NIS2, HIPAA and GDPR and more, giving you audit-ready evidence of continuous security testing.

We already run a bug bounty. Why this too?

Bug bounty is opportunistic and pays per finding. Continuous pentesting is systematic and covers the apps nobody submits against. Feed your past bounty findings in and Escape regression tests them.

Will it reduce what we pay out in bug bounty?

That is what customers tell us, for two reasons. The obvious one is finding issues before a researcher submits them. The less obvious one is triage: upload your past bounty and pentest reports, and Escape validates what is still open, what is already fixed, and what was never real, then converts the live ones into regression tests. It is not a replacement for your programme. It reduces the duplicate and low-value end of it.

Seamless docking. Every pentest mission.

AI pentesting that fits seamlessly
into how your security team already works

modern frameworks
cloud environments
security tools
developer tools
Pyhton
Ready to protect your applications?

The next assessment should not wait for the next budget cycle.

Book a demo
Book a demo