Top 6 API security testing tools in 2025: a full review

đź’ˇ
The Top 6 API Security Testing Tools include:

1. Escape
2. Noname security
3. Salt Security
4. Stackhawk
5. Rapid7
6. Traceable

How safe are your applications? In recent years, the significance of API usage and hence of API security has skyrocketed. However, as API adoption skyrockets, so do security threats. Are your API security tools equipped to protect your applications from breaches and vulnerabilities?

According to Vanson Bourne's recent survey, 98% of enterprise leaders believe that APIs are an essential for growth, but securing them remains a challenge.

The financial risks are real— in November 2023, crypto firm Kronos Research said $26 million worth of cryptocurrency was stolen from its systems following a cyber attack. The company said that it experienced “unauthorized access” to some of its API keys, forcing it to pause trading and begin an investigation.

With the upcoming OWASP API Security Top 10 update, we'll see new attack vectors are constantly emerging. Organizations must leverage the best API security tools that adapt to new business risks and ensure comprehensive protection against API-related vulnerabilities to stay ahead.

In this article, we've prepared for you the selection of the best API security tools to help you protect your applications. We'll not only provide the description of each API security tool but also outline the pros and cons to help you make the best judgment. Let's dive right in!

Why is API Security important?

API security is crucial because it protects the integrity of your data and services. APIs, being the connecting threads between different software applications, are vulnerable to attacks. Ensuring their security means protecting your application's core functions and the sensitive data they handle.

According to Derek Fisher in the Elephant in AppSec podcast, "mindset we all in the security space need to have: assume that everybody within your network or within your system is adversarial".

You have to model all possible threats to your APIs and integrate the action plan into your Application Security program to strengthen your organizational API security posture.

In 2024 alone, we've already suffered several API breaches, including Spoutible, Trello, and Glow. A breach a month keeps the security team on alert, not the hackers away...

Want to know more about how to proceed? Deep dive into our detailed API security checklist.

đź’ˇ
Building your application security program from scratch? Watch or read our guide on building an effective product security program.

Features of the best API security tools

When it comes to keeping your APIs safe, you need a good API security solution. Let's examine the main features that make the best API security tools special.

API Discovery & Inventory

Don’t know what your developers expose online? Here is when API Discovery and Inventory come into play. Every undocumented API feels like a ticking time bomb, a potential gateway for malicious breaches.

To ensure that the organization's data and services remain protected and bridge the gap between innovation and security, your top priority is to create a comprehensive inventory of all used APIs.

Need more information about API discovery? Check out here why API discovery is important and what is the difference between automated and manual approaches.

Automated API Discovery tools are indispensable to ensure efficiency, accuracy, and comprehensive coverage. Manual discovery should be seen as a complementary approach rather than a primary method in modern API management.

API Security in CI/CD

If you want to catch and fix API security issues early in your development process, you must integrate security within your CI/CD pipeline. It helps you ensure your applications are built securely from the ground up and helps your organization to shift left testing of APIs.

Custom security tests

Each organization's API stack and their structure are not the same. You, as a security engineer, sometimes need to be able to write or extend your automated security tests to find vulnerabilities specific to your APIs. This can be particularly useful for running static security assessments on your web applications, identifying regression bugs, or investigating specialized in-house security concerns.

Support in remediation

Tired of struggling to get developers on board with API security in the SDLC? Making life easier for your developers is important to ensure swift security fixes. Detailed remediation code snippets help to break down complex security issues into simple, actionable steps, so your developers can quickly fix any problems that pop up.

Ease of deployment

No one wants a complicated setup process. The faster you can start scanning, the faster you can protect your organization. Agentless solutions are your best bet: An agentless deployment method involves gathering data without the need to alter application code and without inserting any agents into the application's communication path.

No fuss, just quick and efficient protection.

Testing undocumented APIs

Hidden vulnerabilities can be a big risk. Testing undocumented APIs is important to find those hidden weaknesses and keep your data safe from potential threats.

Contextual risk-based prioritization

Prioritizing security tasks is vital. Contextual Risk-Based Prioritization is a strategy used in risk management and security to determine the priority of addressing vulnerabilities or threats based on their potential impact and context within a specific environment.

It helps you focus on what's most important first for your business, making sure you're putting your efforts where they matter the most.

Top API security tools

Escape

Escape

Escape is built to help you get the value out of its platform in the shortest time possible. It allows you to discover your APIs within a matter of minutes. Escape uses a sophisticated combination of subdomain enumeration, AI-powered fingerprinting, and OSINT techniques to identify and inventory APIs. This ensures that all APIs, including those not actively in use, are discovered and documented.

It's a dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool - a type of black-box testing that checks for security problems while the software is actually running. For testing, Escape relies on its proprietary feedback-driven Business Logic Security Testing algorithm. It excels in detecting even complex business-logic vulnerabilities, especially in modern API types like GraphQL. Escape's algortihm addresses this complexity by autonomously generating legitimate traffic to test API's business logic.

Escape helps security teams automate testing for OWASP Top 10 and complex business logic flaws at scale.

In addition, actionable remediation code snippets for every finding and native CI/CD integration empower developers to adopt security by design.

Want to see Escape's API discovery capabilities in action? Check out the video below:

Pros

  • Exceptional ability to discover even Shadow APIs in minutes by scanning exposed source code, reducing the time to value and risk of overlooked vulnerabilities
  • Automated schema generation that helps you to launch scans right away and reduces the need for maintenance
  • In-depth GraphQL testing capabilities and lowest false-positive rate
  • Ability to prioritize the most critical API by business context, data sensitivity, and exposure.
  • Actionable remediation code snippets for developers that help you build better relationships with them
  • Effortless custom checks integration to automate security tests tailored to specific APIs
  • Easy-to-set-up automated testing and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Ideal for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Open-source extensions like GraphQL Armor

Cons

  • Advanced feature sets may require specialized knowledge
  • Number of integrations with some of the operational tools

Noname Security (recently acquired by Akamai) 

Noname security landing page before it got acquired by Akamai

The Noname API Security Platform (recently acquired by Akamai) proactively secures environments from API security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, design flaws, and provides API attack protection with automated detection and response.

Noname Active Testing sometimes gets confused with a DAST, but that is not its functionality. Noname Active Testing compares an API with its Swagger file to assess its conformance. 

Pros

  • Easy to understand for network engineers (though the learning curve might be steeper for security engineers with another background)
  • Focuses strongly on helping to ensure regulatory compliance.
  • Since they’re looking at API traffic, they’re able to detect exploits in runtime, but it only helps to adapt a reactive approach.
  • The findings from Noname may appear to be real detection events, but they are often quite basic, such as merely checking if an authentication header is present.
  • Noname covers a broad range of API types.

Cons

  • Setup time: The customization process can be time-consuming, requiring more upfront investment in setup. Testing requires full application deployment first, as well as ingesting logs from your staging or lower environments.
  • If your primary concern is detecting APIs, being reliant on network logs doesn’t really solve your problem, as it requires them to be behind your normal network flows in the first place! This is because network logs can only capture traffic that is actively passing through your network. Therefore, they can only detect APIs that are already being used and generating traffic. You're at risk of missing exposed and vulnerable Shadow APIs.
  • Detection alerts are heavily based on baselines, which makes them very noisy and full of false positives.
  • Testing requires manually uploading schemas when they change - it doesn’t automatically detect them.
  • Response actions are incredibly cumbersome - you get drowned in these alerts and then respond by building WAF rules.
  • You can't accelerate the remediation process because of the lack of actionable remediation code snippets for developers.
  • Not accessible for small and medium-sized businesses: pricing starts at $150,000 entry level package for 1 year

Salt Security

Salt Security landing page

Salt Security was founded in 2016 by alumni of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and serial entrepreneur executives in the cybersecurity field and is based in Silicon Valley and Israel. 

It is an API security platform that offers a comprehensive solution for all APIs, providing robust API discovery and attack prevention capabilities. It provides a deep contextual analysis of API traffic to detect and prioritize potential threats based on their real-world impact.

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of API protocols: REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and gRPC.
  • Real-Time Detection: The platform can detect certain security threats in real-time based on network traffic.
  • Integration Options: Salt Security offers numerous integration points for network logs and can detect sensitive data using these logs.
  • Posture Management: Users can save searches as posture rules, enhancing ongoing security assessments.

Cons

  • High cost for small businesses: $50,000/Start up plan Console Access and Support + up to 5M API calls/month for 12 months and $350,000 for Enterprise plans.
  • Limited Testing: The system lacks comprehensive testing capabilities, as it primarily analyzes network logs without testing actual payloads, leading to potential blind spots in detection.
  • Header-Based Alerts: Most alerts are based on HTTP headers rather than payloads, which may cause confusion and diminish the effectiveness of threat detection.
  • Basic Scanning: Scanning capabilities are considered basic, primarily crawling known API endpoints without proactively discovering dormant or unmonitored APIs outside of API gateways, proxies, or WAFs.
  • Noisy Risk Scoring: Risk scoring is very basic and can generate a lot of noise, complicating prioritization.
  • High Costs: Utilizing traffic mirroring for detection can significantly increase logging costs, making it a potentially expensive option for organizations.
  • Lack of Actionable Remediation: The absence of actionable remediation code snippets slows down the fixing process.

StackHawk

Stackhawk landing page

Stackhawk is a DAST tool that scans APIs for potential vulnerabilities. Stackhawk is built on top of OWASP ZAP and works by simulating an attack, which is based on common open-source vulnerabilities like OWASP top 10 or custom attack definitions, and observing how the API responds. In other words, it tries to leverage known vulnerabilities on the API to observe how it reacts to them to determine if the API is secure against the vulnerability or not.

Stackhawk provides integration with your CI/CD so that you can automate the testing of every API endpoint in your application.

Stackhawk balances ease of deployment with advanced risk-based prioritization. Offers an intuitive dashboard for monitoring and responding to threats.

Pros

  • Easy setup for smaller teams or organizations with good pricing options to get started.
  • The risk assessment tool is user-friendly for security engineers with developer backgrounds.
  • Supports a large number of integrations.
  • Tests various API types.

Cons

  • Reliance on ZAP & Limited coverage for business logic vulnerabilities
  • Discovers APIs only within code repositories. No external API discovery capabilities or enriched API inventory
  • You need to have OpenAPI specs on hand to start scanning. Spec uploads and configuration require manual effort, which could be difficult to do for larger organizations or more complex applications with large development and lean security teams
  • StackHawk scan results payload is organized as a list of every unique finding across the scan. It provides information about vulnerability, risk, confidence, paths and may include OWASP Cheatsheet, but does not offer detailed remediation code snippets for developers
  • StackHawk's prioritization is based on the OWASP Risk Rating Methodology. The OWASP Risk Rating Methodology primarily focuses on the technical aspects of security issues, such as their impact and exploitability. It may not take into account the specific context of your application, its users, or your business objectives. 
  • While it could be good for small to mid-sized teams, larger enterprises might find its capabilities insufficient for extensive or highly customized needs
đź’ˇ

Rapid7

Rapid7 InsightAppSec landing page

InsightAppSec is part of Rapid7's security suite, providing Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) for mature and maturing Application Security professionals.  It offers a robust API discovery and a strong emphasis on remediation support. More than that, InsightAppSec incorporates extensive security coverage and detailed guidance for fixing vulnerabilities.

Pros

  • Part of the overall comprehensive vulnerability platform
  • Rich reporting and integrations
  • Covers various applications
  • Extensive dashboard customization options
  • Supports Swagger files
  • Custom attack templates that help to customize security testing but might require a lot of maintenance

Cons

  • Lack of API discovery and inventory
  • It treats APIs and applications the same, without distinguishing between the unique requirements of API security
  • Lack of quality support for GraphQL APIs.
  • Long scanning times & lots of false positives
  • Testing requires manually uploading schemas when they change - it doesn’t automatically detect them
  • You can't accelerate the remediation process because of the lack of actionable remediation code snippets for developers.
  • Lack of alerting workflows
đź’ˇ
Want to find out why the security teams choose Escape over competitors for their GraphQL APIs? Check our Lightspeed's case study.

Traceable

Traceable landing page

Traceable’s API security platform empowers security teams with comprehensive API discovery, risk assessment, and real-time threat prevention. It helps organizations identify vulnerabilities, stop data exfiltration attacks, and gain deep analytics for proactive defense.

With its strong roots in Application Performance Monitoring (APM), Traceable excels in API tracing and behavioral analytics—giving it a unique edge in detecting sophisticated threats. However, its integration complexity and developer experience may not align with every team’s workflow, making it essential to evaluate its suitability based on your security needs.

Pros

  • Comprehensive tracing and detection: Traceable uses application performance monitoring (APM) roots, enabling sophisticated tracing. This includes detailed application maps and looking up users via session IDs.
  • Custom-built detections: Its detection capabilities are advanced and highly customizable, helping identify complex threats within API environments.
  • Testing based on actual traffic data and without authentification: Traceable uses contextual fuzzing based on API traffic, making tests feel relevant. The primary benefit is being able to run tests without setting up authentication. This functionality appears to leverage logs that include authenticated users, allowing tests to be conducted as those users and fuzzing their payloads. However, this method presents significant constraints. It really limits the kinds of testing you can do - whether that’s testing with sensitive data or specific user types. It also limits which APIs will get tested, as if there’s no traffic there’s no test..

Cons

  • Heavy integration lift for API discovery: Requires network or agent-based integrations, which can complicate and slow down deployment.
  • Not a developer-friendly testing experience: Testing results are presented in a way that may not be easily actionable for developers, potentially extending the time required to address vulnerabilities and leading to frustration.
  • API security testing process feels very manual: The UI is very much built around creating test suites and then kicking off those scans, rather than a true CI/CD integration (although it does technically have those). If you look for ways to automate and scale your security scans in CI/CD, Traceable won't be a good solution.
  • Reliance on traffic data for testing: APIs without active traffic, as well as those located outside of API gateways, WAFs, or proxies, may not be tested effectively.
đź’ˇ
Check out the complete comparison between Traceable and Escape here.

Conclusion: API security tools adapted to your needs

Selecting the right API security tool depends on your specific needs and existing infrastructure. Whether you prioritize comprehensive coverage, ease of deployment, or contextual threat analysis, there's a tool tailored to your requirements. In 2024, staying ahead in cybersecurity means choosing an API security tool that not only protects but also automates your API management and allows you to customize your needs.


đź’ˇ Want to learn more about API security? Check out the following articles:

Prefer hands-on learning? Check out our API Security Academy and learn how to secure your GraphQL applications.